Abstract
The European Capitals
of Culture (ECOC) is the most ambitious cultural collaborative programme in
Europe. During its first 15-year period (1985-2000), ECOC projects were
hosted by several national capitals and principal cultural cities in Europe. In the second phase, the programme
also began to discover smaller and less well-known cities of interest where results would be more visible and beyond
one year. Given there has been such a long period of 33 years since the first
designation of a European Capital of Culture, there is an opportunity to evaluate the whole programme as well as individual
projects in terms of their regeneration impacts. The paper is focused on the ECOC legacy of two medium-sized cities Guimarães (ECOC
in 2012, Portugal) and Košice (ECOC in 2013, Slovakia). The assessment of the ECOC impact of these two cities on tourism and urban development is based
on the same methodology, giving the possibility
of first-hand comparison and in-depth interpretation.
The cluster analysis of all European
ECOC cities identifies clusters on the basis of their mutual similarity. Thereafter, several
research questions are studied based on the
interview research in the cities
of Guimarães and Košice. Although the two cities aimed to take the hosting of
the ECOC as a significant tailored point of their development, their legacies
have revealed comparatively different in several dimensions. While Guimarães
succeeded in enhancing its tourist attraction and visibility, but less in
expanding the cultural dynamics, Košice is an example of culture-led
development overcoming the provincial cultural offer on the East-European
border. Both cities made it possible to achieve a positive impact corresponding
to the initial project goals, but reaching somewhat different effects, evident
at a distance of several years.
Keywords: European
Capital of Culture; Mega-events Impacts; Cultural Legacy; Medium Sized Cities;
Cities Socioeconomic Profile.
Oto
Hudec, Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic (Oto.Hudec@tuke.sk)
Paula
Remoaldo, Lab2PT (Landscape, Heritage and Territory Laboratory), University of
Minho, Portugal (paularemoaldo@gmail.com)
Nataša
Urbančíková, Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic
(natasa.urbancikova@tuke.sk)
J.
Cadima Ribeiro, NIPE, University of Minho, Portugal (jcadima@eeg.uminho.pt)
[Resumo de comunicação apresentada no 58th ERSA Congress, subordinado genericamente ao tema ´Places for People: Innovative, Inclusive and Liveable Regions`, que decorreu na University College Cork, Cork, Irlanda, entre 28 e 21 de agosto de 2018]
[Resumo de comunicação apresentada no 58th ERSA Congress, subordinado genericamente ao tema ´Places for People: Innovative, Inclusive and Liveable Regions`, que decorreu na University College Cork, Cork, Irlanda, entre 28 e 21 de agosto de 2018]
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário